Growing recognition of its complexity and prevalence has added urgency to the search for global solutions. Encouraged by the large scale use of antibiotics, it can spread via multiple routes between farm animals, humans and the wider environment (O’Neill, 2016 Woolhouse et al. In situating antibiotics within this landscape of disease prevention and control, this article challenges existing claims about their reception and impact, decentres them from the history of intensive farming, and draws attention to other methods of promoting pig health, which may find renewed applications as we move towards a post-antibiotic era.Īntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is currently regarded as one of the greatest threats to human health. Recognition of the roles played by housing, husbandry, nutrition, and pathogens in the production of pig disease suggested multiple possible points of intervention.

They were rooted in a shared understanding of pig diseases as highly complex phenomena that resulted from interactions between pig bodies and their environments. Devised by vets, farmers and other experts, these methods predated antibiotics and evolved alongside them. It draws on evidence from veterinary journals, farming magazines, and government-appointed committees to demonstrate the significance of other methods of countering the diseases that emerged in association with intensive production systems. 1925-65, as a case study, this article argues that their impact has been overstated. Using the health and production of UK pigs, ca. It is widely assumed that the development of antibiotics had a transformative effect on livestock production by making it possible to keep larger numbers of animals in smaller spaces without them succumbing to disease.

Andkon home sheep home 2